The New York Times has a nicely-written obituary for computing pioneer Ken Kennedy, penned by John Markoff. Here’s a snippet:
A member of the generation of researchers who were the first to have access to modern supercomputers, Mr. Kennedy spearheaded early work on software programs known as parallelizing compilers, systems that can automatically spread workloads among a large number of processors, vastly speeding calculations.
Early computers were based on a single processor that would perform the steps of a software program sequentially. But in the 1970s and 1980s researchers began to look for ways to increase computing speed by harnessing tens, hundreds and even thousands of processors, in much the fashion that adding lanes to a freeway will allow more traffic to flow.
The challenge that such systems presented was the need to create programming tools that would hide the interdependencies and complexity from the scientists and engineers who wanted to use the machines as problem-solving tools.
“These compilers made it possible for mere mortals to write advanced programs,” said Edward Lazowska, the Bill and Melinda Gates professor of computer science at the University of Washington in Seattle. “Ken was the No. 1 person in parallel compiling.” (Parallel compilers are software programs that translate programmers language-oriented instructions into numeric codes that control computer operation.)
The software technology he developed has served as the foundation for successive generations of scientists and engineers who developed advanced simulations, including weather and climate prediction and the model of automobile collisions. Moreover, the fruits of his technology are now rapidly reaching broad consumer audiences both through the latest generations of personal computers and through videogame players, which now come equipped with parallel processors.
Kennedy also played an important role on the first incarnation of the President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), which put together the 1999 Information Technology Research: Investing in our Future report. The strong, well-supported recommendations in that report helped pave the way for a dramatic expansion of the federal government’s support for computer science research. Kennedy was also a co-PI on CRA’s Computing Community Consortium proposal, which was ultimately successful.
I was privileged to have a few interactions with Kennedy over the six years or so I’ve been at CRA and was always impressed with his grasp of policy and his willingness to do more than was necessary in service of the field. Update: Chuck Koelbel from Rice passed along these additional details:
A memorial service for Dr. Kennedy will take place at First Presbyterian Church, 5300 Main Street, Houston, on Thursday, February 15 at 3pm. In lieu of flowers, the family suggest gifts be made to Rice University, Ken Kennedy Memorial Fund. Checks may be mailed to Rice University MS-81, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX, 77251-1892. To contribute online, visit giving.rice.edu, click “Make a Gift Online”, choose “Designation-Other, and type “Ken Kennedy Memorial Fund” in the Special Instruction box.
As we noted yesterday, the National Science Foundation does quite well in the President’s FY 2008 Budget Request, slated to grow 6.8 percent over FY 2007 (or nearly $409 million) to $6.4 billion. That growth rate would continue NSF on the 10-year “doubling” trajectory originally set by the Administration as part of last year’s American Competitiveness Initiative. The news for the computing community that is so heavily reliant on NSF is equally good — both the Computing and Information Science and Engineering directorate and the Office of Cyberinfrastructure would see big gains in the President’s plan. Here are the details (brace for charts):
First, the macro level view of the agency:
National Science Foundation (in millions of dollars)
FY06 Actual
FY07 Budget Request
FY08 Request
$ Change vs FY07 Request
% Change vs FY07 Request (%)
Research and Related Activities
$4,449.25
$4,765.95
$5,131.69
$365.74
7.7%
Education and Human Resources
$700.26
$716.22
$750.60
$34.48
4.8%
MREFC
$233.81
$240.45
$244.74
$4.29
1.8%
Agency Operations and Award Management
$247.06
$281.82
$285.59
$3.77
1.3%
National Science Board
$3.94
$3.91
$4.03
$0.12
3.1%
Office of the Inspector General
$11.47
$11.86
$12.35
$0.49
4.1%
Total NSF
$5,645.79
$6,020.21
$6,429.00
$408.79
6.8%
As you can see, the great bulk of the Administration’s planned increase is aimed at the Research and Related Activities (R&RA) account, home of NSF’s research directorates. The agency’s education efforts — in the Education and Human Resources directorate — would also see an increase, though not nearly as robust as R&RA. Of particular interest to those of us in the computing community, NSF is using some of the increase provided by ACI on a new NSF-wide initiative called “Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation” (CDI) that aims to “broaden the Nation’s capability for innovation by developing a new generation of computationally based discovery concepts and tools to deal with complex, data-rich and interacting systems.” The $52 million initiative will be led by NSF’s CISE directorate (who will control $20 million of the funding), with participation from Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Science, Social, Behavioral and Economic science, Cyberinfrastructure, International Science, and EHR. The agency appears to have big plans for the initative, projecting out-year funding growing to $250 million in FY 2012 (with CISE hopefully maintaining a proportional share).
Drilling down a little further, here’s the Directorate by Directorate breakdown within R&RA:
NSF Research and Related Activities Directorate Budgets (in millions of dollars)
FY06 Actual
FY07 Budget Request
FY08 Request
$ Change vs FY07 Request
% Change vs FY07 Request (%)
Biological Sciences
$580.90
$607.85
$633.00
$25.15
4.1%
Computer and Information Science and Engineering
$496.35
$526.69
$574.00
$47.31
9.0%
Engineering
$585.46
$628.55
$683.30
$54.75
8.7%
Geosciences
$703.95
$744.85
$792.00
$47.15
6.3%
Mathematical and Physical Sciences
$1,086.61
$1,150.30
$1,253.00
$102.70
8.9%
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
$201.23
$213.76
$222.00
$8.24
3.9%
Office of Cyberinfrastructure
$127.14
$182.42
$200.00
$17.58
9.6%
Office of International Science and Engineering
$42.61
$40.61
$45.00
$4.39
10.8%
Office of Polar Programs
$390.54
$438.10
$464.90
$26.80
6.1%
Integrative Activities1
$233.30
$231.37
$263.00
$31.63
13.7%
U.S. Arctic Research Commission
$1.17
$1.45
$1.49
$0.04
2.8%
Total, Research and Related Activities
$4,449.25
$4,765.95
$5,131.69
$365.74
7.7%
The increases weren’t evenly distributed throughout the directorates. Of the research directorates, CISE would see the largest percentage increase. In fact, the 9 percent requested growth rate is the largest for the directorate in seven years. Here’s how CISE plans to spend the funding:
NSF CISE Directorate Funding (in millions of dollars)
FY06 Actual
FY07 Budget Request
FY08 Request
$ Change vs FY07 Request
% Change vs FY07 Request (%)
Computing and Communication Foundation
$105.30
$122.82
$149.15
$26.33
21.4%
Computer and Network Systems
$141.07
$162.98
$191.98
$29.00
17.8%
Information and Intelligent Systems
$103.78
$119.30
$154.63
$35.33
29.6%
Information Technology Research
$146.20
$121.59
$78.24
-$43.35
-35.7%
Total, CISE
$496.35
$526.69
$574.00
$47.31
9.0%
Deborah Crawford, the acting AD for CISE, highlighted a number of new programs the new funding — and funding freed up as the ITR program comes to an end — would allow the directorate to pursue. First is an emphasis on “Discovery Research for Innovation,” which includes these new efforts:
High Risk, High Return Research ($50 million) — “Seeking Big Ideas in support of Grand Vision.” Programs in the area will focus on fundamental questions in computing, larger projects, and try to exploit the potential of emerging technologies.
Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation ($20 million) — As detailed above, CISE will lead this NSF-wide effort, focusing on promoting computational thinking for problem solving.
In addition, CISE will continue its support for planning of the Global Environment for Networking Innovations with $20 million in funding for pre-construction planning. GENI was also included in the Foundation’s 2007 Facility plan as the first “Horizon” project — a step away from “Readiness Stage,” which would allow for extensive pre-construction planning. GENI is one of 10 projects listed as “Horizon” projects. (There’s just one project in the Readiness Stage in FY 2008 — the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope — and just one that is listed as a possible new start in FY 2008 (the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory)).
The budget also includes statistics on the number of awards and the funding rate estimates for the directorate in FY 06, 07 and 08. The directorate estimates it will fund fewer research grants in FY 07 than it did in FY 06 (950 in FY07 vs 1,003 in FY06), with a corresponding drop in funding rate (18 percent in FY07 vs 22 percent in FY06). For FY08, the directorate expects the number of research grants to grow to 1,000 and the funding rate to rise a bit to 20 percent.
Despite those figures, this is, overall, a very promising start for computing at NSF in FY 2008 — which, given NSF’s role in funding 87 percent of academic basic research in computing, makes it a good start for the field.
As stated in a previous post about the FY08 Budget Request, Department of Energys Office of Science did well with a $296 million, or 7 percent, increase over the FY07 request. The Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) request is $340.2 million, an increase of $21.5 million or 6.8 percent.
The ASCR has three overarching programs: Research in applied mathematics and computer science with a request of $82.8 million up from $69.6 million in the FY07 request; Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) with a request of $56.3 million up from $56.1 million in the FY07 request; and High-performance computing and network facilities and testbeds with a request of $201.1 million up from $193 million in the FY07 request.
Overall these are good numbers for computing, and science, and certainly help to make up for some of the recent lean years. As always, well keep you posted as we learn more and as the budget process goes forward on Capitol Hill.
President Bush released his FY 2008 budget request today and it appears that, as promised, the Administration remains committed to the American Competitiveness Initiative and the doubling trajectory for three key science agencies begun in last year’s budget request. We’ve only just started digging into the budget documents — and we’ll be getting more in-depth agency briefings later this afternoon — but here are some of the top-level numbers: [Just a note, comparing some of these numbers to FY 2007 is a bit problematic because the final FY 2007 estimates aren’t in yet. So in all cases but Defense and Homeland Security, the comparison is to the President’s requested funding level for FY 2007, which, in most cases, is probably actually higher than the final FY 2007 level set by the CR is likely to be. Therefore, the increases shown for these agencies’ requests may actually be greater compared to the final FY 2007 numbers.] National Science Foundation: Overall funding would rise to $6.429 billion in FY 2008, an increase of $409 million or 7 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 budget request. NSF’s research accounts would grow $648 million over the FY 2007 request to $4.880 billion, an increase of 15 percent. National Institute of Standards and Technology: (Intramural Research and Facilities) NIST’s core research and facilities accounts would grow to $586 million in FY 2008, an increase of $55 million or 10 percent over the President’s FY 2007 request. Department of Energy, Office of Science: Increase to $4.398 billion, or $296 million or 7 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 request. Defense: Defense is trickier to figure out because it and Homeland Security are the only two agencies with enacted levels for FY 2007. In the President’s FY 2008 request, Defense basic and applied research would decline $1.110 billion vs. the FY 2007 enacted level to $5.785 billion, a 16 percent reduction. For Basic research (6.1), the Administration requests $1.428 billion, a reduction of $137 million from the FY 07 enacted level (9 percent) and just $7 million more than the President requested in FY 07. Applied research would fall to $4.357 billion under the President’s plan, $973 million (18 percent) lower than FY 07 enacted, and $121 million less than he requested in FY 07. National Institutes of Health: The Administration plan would set NIH’s budget at $28.700 billion in FY 2008, $432 million more than the President’s FY 2007 request, but about $188 million short of the amount likely to be enacted in the FY 2007 CR. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: NOAA would see its research budget rise to $358 million in FY 2008 under the President’s plan, an increase of $20 million or 6 percent compared to his FY 2007 request. We have to do a bit more digging to see how this will compare with the CR level. National Aeronautics and Space Administration: NASA’s Science account would grow to $5.516 billion in FY 2008, $186 million or 3 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 request. Networking and Information Technology R&D Program: This is the cross-agency budget line for the NITRD program, one of just three interagency R&D efforts listed in the budget (the other two are the National Nanotechnology Initiative and the Climate Change Science Program). I’m hesitant to just put up the raw numbers here, because they always require some interpretation (see last year, for example), but the bottom line number is that the NITRD program would stay essentially flat at $3.057 billion in FY 2008, a $12 million increase over the President’s FY 2007 request (and the FY 2007 Defense enacted number). Slated for increases would be NSF’s NITRD activities, which would grow $90 million to $994 million, a 10 percent increase, and the Department of Energy and NASA, which would both increase by 4 percent. Defense IT R&D would suffer a 2 percent cut vs. the FY 2007 enacted level, and NIH would see a 14 percent decrease vs. the President’s FY 07 request. But it’s going to take a bit more investigating to figure out where NITRD really stands vs. FY 2007.
Just for comparison’s sake, the NNI would grow by 4 percent in FY 08 (to $1.447 billion) and the Climate Change Science Program would decline 7 percent to $1.544 billion.
We expect to have a lot more detail after the agency briefings this afternoon. We’ll post whatever we learn as soon as we can.
By the way, all the budget documents are perusable here.
Since it’s apparently official, we can spread the word that the new head of NSF’s Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate is Jeannette Wing, president’s professor and head of the Computer Science Department at Carnegie Mellon. Jeanette takes over for Peter Freeman, who served as CISE AD since 2002. Jeannette will take over CISE starting July 1, 2007.
Those who know Jeannette will likely agree that the computing community is lucky to have someone with her passion and energy for the field ready (and willing) to take such a critical position. We at CRA join in wishing her the best of luck and stand willing to help as she takes the reins.
Read NSF’s official release.
It appears House and Senate appropriators have reached a final agreement on the “continuing resolution” for FY 2007 and it looks like good news for federal science agencies. For weeks now we (and the other members of the science community) have been concerned that FY 2007 appropriations debacle would freeze agencies like NSF, NIST, and DOE’s Office of Science at FY 2006 levels, postponing planned increases to the agencies called for in the President’s American Competitiveness Initiative and approved by the full House and the Senate Appropriations Committee. However, in a joint continuing resolution filed last night, the House and Senate Appropriations Committee chairs agreed to exempt NSF, NIST, and DOE Office of Science (and NIH additionally) from the CR and provide increases to each agency’s FY 2007 budget.
While the agencies won’t receive the full amounts they requested as part of ACI, each agency should receive significantly more than they received in FY 2006. Under the agreement, NSF’s research accounts would receive a 6 7.7 percent increase, slightly below the 7.8 percent matching the increase called for in the ACI, but $335 million more than FY 2006.* NIST would receive $50 million in additional funding for its core research budget. DOE Office of Science would see $200 million more than FY 06, plus the elimination of $127.8 million in earmarks that would then be available for competitive research. And NIH, while not officially part of the ACI and expecting flat-funding in FY 07, would see an increase of $619.5 million — which, according to the appropriations committee, would “support an additional 500 research project grants, 1,500 first time investigators, and expand funding for high risk and high-impact research.”
Given where we thought we might be as a result of the CR, this is great news. The agreement was announced by both House Appropriations Chair David Obey (D-WI) and Senate Appropriations Chair Robert Byrd (D-WV), so it’s a good bet that the bill will pass in its current form. The House will vote on the CR on Wednesday and the Senate will take it up soon after.
This is a big win for the science community. Protecting these increases for the federal investment in science in a resolution that cut more than 60 other domestic programs below FY 2006 levels sends a powerful signal that basic research is a national priority. Science was one of just a few priorities protected by Congressional Democrats in the bill — it joins federal highway programs, veteran’s health care, the FBI and local law enforcement, and Pell grant funding. The science community — along with its partners in industry — weighed in heavily in support of ACI funding, and its clear that advocacy had the desired effect. So thanks to all of you who joined with CRA as part of the Computing Research Advocacy Network to help make the case for science. It’s clear your voices were heard!
We’ll have more details as this bill moves towards final passage. Then it’s on to FY 2008, which just might be off to a good start. Update: (5:50 pm, 1/31/07) — The House easily passed the measure today, unamended, by a vote of 286-140. The Senate should take up the resolution next week. Update: (4:22 pm, 2/8/07) — * a closer look at the numbers actually in the resolution show that it only specifically calls out NSF’s R&RA account, increasing it $335 million over FY 2006 to $4.7 billion (matching the Administration’s request). It appears the remainder of NSF’s accounts aren’t addressed in the resolution and so they’ll stay at FY 06 levels.
The Senate is considering the resolution today. The Senate Democrats have apparently blocked any amendments to the resolution from Republicans (using some of the Senate’s arcane procedural techniques), so it’s likely it will pass in its current form.
In contrast to last year’s State of the Union address by the President, this year’s speech didn’t feature much in the way of competitiveness or themes. While we’ve gotten many assurances from the White House in recent weeks that the President’s American Competitiveness Initiative — introduced with great fanfare last year and currently mired in the debacle which has become the FY 07 Appropriations process — is still a priority for the Administration and will continue in the FY 08 budget, in the wake of Tuesday’s State of the Union I thought I’d just check in again and make sure things hadn’t changed. Fortunately, they haven’t. Here’s the word from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (posted with permission):
Me: I notice the ACI didn’t recieve much mention in the President’s SOTU. Is ACI still a priority for the Administration? Will we see the commitment continue in FY 08? OSTP: The SOTU was focused this year to a limited number of topics (mostly new of course), but I can assure you were still fully committed to its success. FYI, below is a response to a similar question that Dr. Marburger shared with a reporter earlier this week. I suspect well have more details to share between now and the budget release so Ill keep you posted.
…
The President remains fully committed to the success of the American Competitiveness Initiative and the Administration looks forward to Year Two of the ACI and working with the 110th Congress to achieve the Presidents vision for innovation.
Individually, the House and Senate funded Year One of the Presidents proposal to increase basic research in the physical sciences. However, to remain on track to meet the Presidents goal of doubling funding for these key research agencies over 10 years, Congress now needs to complete full funding for Year One of the Initiative (FY07).
The White House also indicated it plans to continue working to see ACI addressed in whatever final resolution Congress comes up with for FY 07 appropriations. News on that front is that the House plans to take up the CR next week, but as of this writing, there’s still no final decision on what will make the cut and what won’t. By pledging to “eliminate earmarks” in the CR, appropriators will free up somewhere on the order of $17 billion to $33 billion in funding to apply to agencies for FY 07. But that range demonstrates the difficulties the decision-makers are facing — gaining consensus on what constitutes an earmark in this case is fraught with political landmines. As a result, there is even talk at the moment of yet again extending the CR for a short duration past the Feb 15th deadline to give appropriators more time to negotiate a CR that will extend the balance of the fiscal year.
As always, as we learn more detail, we’ll pass it on….
The House Committee on Science and Technology has announced its membership and subcommittee chairs for the 110th Congress. The committee membership includes 24 Democrats and 20 Republicans with one vacancy on the minority membership. The subcommittee structure is slightly different with this Congress in that the some subcommittee names have been changed to more accurately reflect their jurisdictions and a Subcommittee on Investigation and Oversight has been added. The complete list of committee members as well as the subcommittees memberships is available here. Subcommittee on Energy & Environment
Chairman Nick Lampson (D-TX)
Ranking Member Bob Inglis (R-SC) Subcommittee on Technology & Innovation
Chairman David Wu (D-OR)
Ranking Member Phil Gingrey (R-GA) Subcommittee on Research & Science Education
Chairman Brian Baird (D-WA)
Ranking Member Vern Ehlers (R-MI) Subcommittee on Space & Aeronautics
Chairman Mark Udall (D-CO)
Ranking Member Ken Calvert (R-CA) Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight
Chairman Brad Miller (D-NC)
Ranking Member F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-WI)
Essential to our children’s future is the economic security of their families now. Preparing for the 21st century means bolstering our commitment to keep our nation number one. In our Innovation Agenda, unveiled more than a year ago here at the Press Club, House Democrats made a commitment to competitiveness. We will provide our nation with the tools necessary to unleash the next generation of growth and jobs.
In his State of the Union address last year, President Bush spoke of keeping America competitive. With Democrats in the majority, we must work together with our Republican colleagues to do so – nothing less than America’s economic leadership and our national security is at stake.
Innovation and economic growth begins in America’s classrooms. To create a new generation of innovators, we must fund No Child Left Behind so that we can encourage science and math education, taught by the most qualified and effective teachers.
…
Innovation also requires federal grants to our universities, which have long been the spark for great breakthroughs: from the Internet, to biosciences, to fiber optics, to nanotechnology.
We must commit to doubling federal funding for basic research and development in the physical sciences and modernize and expand the research and development tax credit. And we will bring broadband access to every American within five years, creating millions of jobs.
These investments, and initiatives to support a thriving small business environment, will allow us to pursue the long-term, trailblazing research that gives rise to new advances, spawns new industries, and creates good jobs here at home.
We hope this means that basic science research agencies like NSF will receive the President’s proposed increases for the FY07 budget in the forthcoming CR and further increases in future budgets.
The full text of the speech can be found here.
NSF has released some data on the impact of a “continuing resolution” on the agency for FY 2007, something we have discussedpreviouslyin this space. It confirms essentially what we expected: programs will have reduced funding for FY 2007 or be put on hold and award rates and award size will decline signficantly. Some examples:
Overall budget would be $4.175 billion, $400 million below the Adminstration’s request and $168 million below the FY 2004 budget in constant dollars ($4.343 billion);
Will reduce the number of new grants by 10% and the funding rate by 20%
Reductions in programs will include: International Polar Year, Petascale Supercomputer Acquisitions ($50 million for the Office of Cyber Infrastructure’s Petascale Computing system), Explosives and Related Threats, Science of Science and Innovation Policy, and Engineering Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation
New starts that would potentially be on hold are the Alaska Region Research Vessel, National Ecological Observatory Network, and Ocean Observatories Initiative
Administrative costs have risen by $8 million from FY06 to FY07 and offsets in services and infrastructure will be required
The outlook for the remainder of the fiscal year remains highly uncertain, with one possibility being an extension of funding at the current level. While we are acutely aware of the tight constraints on the available budgetary resources, NSF is continuing to issue program announcements and solicitations as previously planned.
It is likely, however, that NSF may be unable to fund a number of activities planned for this fiscal year. We believe it is important for NSFs grantee community to be aware of this uncertainty, as a number of activities may be affected later in the fiscal year.
Stay tuned and we will update you on the CR status and impacts to agencies as we learn more.
Please use the Category and Archive Filters below, to find older posts. Or you may also use the search bar.
Ken Kennedy
/In: People, R&D in the Press /by Peter HarshaThe New York Times has a nicely-written obituary for computing pioneer Ken Kennedy, penned by John Markoff. Here’s a snippet:
Kennedy also played an important role on the first incarnation of the President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), which put together the 1999 Information Technology Research: Investing in our Future report. The strong, well-supported recommendations in that report helped pave the way for a dramatic expansion of the federal government’s support for computer science research. Kennedy was also a co-PI on CRA’s Computing Community Consortium proposal, which was ultimately successful.
I was privileged to have a few interactions with Kennedy over the six years or so I’ve been at CRA and was always impressed with his grasp of policy and his willingness to do more than was necessary in service of the field.
Update: Chuck Koelbel from Rice passed along these additional details:
FY08 Budget Detail: National Science Foundation
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY08 Appropriations /by Peter HarshaAs we noted yesterday, the National Science Foundation does quite well in the President’s FY 2008 Budget Request, slated to grow 6.8 percent over FY 2007 (or nearly $409 million) to $6.4 billion. That growth rate would continue NSF on the 10-year “doubling” trajectory originally set by the Administration as part of last year’s American Competitiveness Initiative. The news for the computing community that is so heavily reliant on NSF is equally good — both the Computing and Information Science and Engineering directorate and the Office of Cyberinfrastructure would see big gains in the President’s plan. Here are the details (brace for charts):
First, the macro level view of the agency:
(in millions of dollars)
Actual
Budget Request
Request
FY07 Request
FY07 Request (%)
As you can see, the great bulk of the Administration’s planned increase is aimed at the Research and Related Activities (R&RA) account, home of NSF’s research directorates. The agency’s education efforts — in the Education and Human Resources directorate — would also see an increase, though not nearly as robust as R&RA. Of particular interest to those of us in the computing community, NSF is using some of the increase provided by ACI on a new NSF-wide initiative called “Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation” (CDI) that aims to “broaden the Nation’s capability for innovation by developing a new generation of computationally based discovery concepts and tools to deal with complex, data-rich and interacting systems.” The $52 million initiative will be led by NSF’s CISE directorate (who will control $20 million of the funding), with participation from Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Science, Social, Behavioral and Economic science, Cyberinfrastructure, International Science, and EHR. The agency appears to have big plans for the initative, projecting out-year funding growing to $250 million in FY 2012 (with CISE hopefully maintaining a proportional share).
Drilling down a little further, here’s the Directorate by Directorate breakdown within R&RA:
Directorate Budgets
(in millions of dollars)
Actual
Budget Request
Request
FY07 Request
FY07 Request (%)
The increases weren’t evenly distributed throughout the directorates. Of the research directorates, CISE would see the largest percentage increase. In fact, the 9 percent requested growth rate is the largest for the directorate in seven years. Here’s how CISE plans to spend the funding:
(in millions of dollars)
Actual
Budget Request
Request
FY07 Request
FY07 Request (%)
Deborah Crawford, the acting AD for CISE, highlighted a number of new programs the new funding — and funding freed up as the ITR program comes to an end — would allow the directorate to pursue. First is an emphasis on “Discovery Research for Innovation,” which includes these new efforts:
In addition, CISE will continue its support for planning of the Global Environment for Networking Innovations with $20 million in funding for pre-construction planning. GENI was also included in the Foundation’s 2007 Facility plan as the first “Horizon” project — a step away from “Readiness Stage,” which would allow for extensive pre-construction planning. GENI is one of 10 projects listed as “Horizon” projects. (There’s just one project in the Readiness Stage in FY 2008 — the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope — and just one that is listed as a possible new start in FY 2008 (the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory)).
The budget also includes statistics on the number of awards and the funding rate estimates for the directorate in FY 06, 07 and 08. The directorate estimates it will fund fewer research grants in FY 07 than it did in FY 06 (950 in FY07 vs 1,003 in FY06), with a corresponding drop in funding rate (18 percent in FY07 vs 22 percent in FY06). For FY08, the directorate expects the number of research grants to grow to 1,000 and the funding rate to rise a bit to 20 percent.
Despite those figures, this is, overall, a very promising start for computing at NSF in FY 2008 — which, given NSF’s role in funding 87 percent of academic basic research in computing, makes it a good start for the field.
FY08 Budget Detail: DOE’s Office of Science
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY08 Appropriations /by MelissaNorrAs stated in a previous post about the FY08 Budget Request, Department of Energys Office of Science did well with a $296 million, or 7 percent, increase over the FY07 request. The Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) request is $340.2 million, an increase of $21.5 million or 6.8 percent.
The ASCR has three overarching programs: Research in applied mathematics and computer science with a request of $82.8 million up from $69.6 million in the FY07 request; Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) with a request of $56.3 million up from $56.1 million in the FY07 request; and High-performance computing and network facilities and testbeds with a request of $201.1 million up from $193 million in the FY07 request.
Overall these are good numbers for computing, and science, and certainly help to make up for some of the recent lean years. As always, well keep you posted as we learn more and as the budget process goes forward on Capitol Hill.
President Releases FY 2008 Budget; Stays Committed to ACI
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY08 Appropriations /by Peter HarshaPresident Bush released his FY 2008 budget request today and it appears that, as promised, the Administration remains committed to the American Competitiveness Initiative and the doubling trajectory for three key science agencies begun in last year’s budget request. We’ve only just started digging into the budget documents — and we’ll be getting more in-depth agency briefings later this afternoon — but here are some of the top-level numbers: [Just a note, comparing some of these numbers to FY 2007 is a bit problematic because the final FY 2007 estimates aren’t in yet. So in all cases but Defense and Homeland Security, the comparison is to the President’s requested funding level for FY 2007, which, in most cases, is probably actually higher than the final FY 2007 level set by the CR is likely to be. Therefore, the increases shown for these agencies’ requests may actually be greater compared to the final FY 2007 numbers.]
National Science Foundation: Overall funding would rise to $6.429 billion in FY 2008, an increase of $409 million or 7 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 budget request. NSF’s research accounts would grow $648 million over the FY 2007 request to $4.880 billion, an increase of 15 percent.
National Institute of Standards and Technology: (Intramural Research and Facilities) NIST’s core research and facilities accounts would grow to $586 million in FY 2008, an increase of $55 million or 10 percent over the President’s FY 2007 request.
Department of Energy, Office of Science: Increase to $4.398 billion, or $296 million or 7 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 request.
Defense: Defense is trickier to figure out because it and Homeland Security are the only two agencies with enacted levels for FY 2007. In the President’s FY 2008 request, Defense basic and applied research would decline $1.110 billion vs. the FY 2007 enacted level to $5.785 billion, a 16 percent reduction. For Basic research (6.1), the Administration requests $1.428 billion, a reduction of $137 million from the FY 07 enacted level (9 percent) and just $7 million more than the President requested in FY 07. Applied research would fall to $4.357 billion under the President’s plan, $973 million (18 percent) lower than FY 07 enacted, and $121 million less than he requested in FY 07.
National Institutes of Health: The Administration plan would set NIH’s budget at $28.700 billion in FY 2008, $432 million more than the President’s FY 2007 request, but about $188 million short of the amount likely to be enacted in the FY 2007 CR.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: NOAA would see its research budget rise to $358 million in FY 2008 under the President’s plan, an increase of $20 million or 6 percent compared to his FY 2007 request. We have to do a bit more digging to see how this will compare with the CR level.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration: NASA’s Science account would grow to $5.516 billion in FY 2008, $186 million or 3 percent greater than the President’s FY 2007 request.
Networking and Information Technology R&D Program: This is the cross-agency budget line for the NITRD program, one of just three interagency R&D efforts listed in the budget (the other two are the National Nanotechnology Initiative and the Climate Change Science Program). I’m hesitant to just put up the raw numbers here, because they always require some interpretation (see last year, for example), but the bottom line number is that the NITRD program would stay essentially flat at $3.057 billion in FY 2008, a $12 million increase over the President’s FY 2007 request (and the FY 2007 Defense enacted number). Slated for increases would be NSF’s NITRD activities, which would grow $90 million to $994 million, a 10 percent increase, and the Department of Energy and NASA, which would both increase by 4 percent. Defense IT R&D would suffer a 2 percent cut vs. the FY 2007 enacted level, and NIH would see a 14 percent decrease vs. the President’s FY 07 request. But it’s going to take a bit more investigating to figure out where NITRD really stands vs. FY 2007.
Just for comparison’s sake, the NNI would grow by 4 percent in FY 08 (to $1.447 billion) and the Climate Change Science Program would decline 7 percent to $1.544 billion.
We expect to have a lot more detail after the agency briefings this afternoon. We’ll post whatever we learn as soon as we can.
By the way, all the budget documents are perusable here.
Jeannette Wing New CISE AD at NSF
/In: People /by Peter HarshaSince it’s apparently official, we can spread the word that the new head of NSF’s Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate is Jeannette Wing, president’s professor and head of the Computer Science Department at Carnegie Mellon. Jeanette takes over for Peter Freeman, who served as CISE AD since 2002. Jeannette will take over CISE starting July 1, 2007.
Those who know Jeannette will likely agree that the computing community is lucky to have someone with her passion and energy for the field ready (and willing) to take such a critical position. We at CRA join in wishing her the best of luck and stand willing to help as she takes the reins.
Read NSF’s official release.
Good News for Science in the FY 07 CR
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY07 Appropriations /by Peter HarshaIt appears House and Senate appropriators have reached a final agreement on the “continuing resolution” for FY 2007 and it looks like good news for federal science agencies. For weeks now we (and the other members of the science community) have been concerned that FY 2007 appropriations debacle would freeze agencies like NSF, NIST, and DOE’s Office of Science at FY 2006 levels, postponing planned increases to the agencies called for in the President’s American Competitiveness Initiative and approved by the full House and the Senate Appropriations Committee. However, in a joint continuing resolution filed last night, the House and Senate Appropriations Committee chairs agreed to exempt NSF, NIST, and DOE Office of Science (and NIH additionally) from the CR and provide increases to each agency’s FY 2007 budget.
While the agencies won’t receive the full amounts they requested as part of ACI, each agency should receive significantly more than they received in FY 2006. Under the agreement, NSF’s research accounts would receive a
67.7 percent increase,slightly below the 7.8 percentmatching the increase called for in the ACI,but$335 million more than FY 2006.* NIST would receive $50 million in additional funding for its core research budget. DOE Office of Science would see $200 million more than FY 06, plus the elimination of $127.8 million in earmarks that would then be available for competitive research. And NIH, while not officially part of the ACI and expecting flat-funding in FY 07, would see an increase of $619.5 million — which, according to the appropriations committee, would “support an additional 500 research project grants, 1,500 first time investigators, and expand funding for high risk and high-impact research.”Given where we thought we might be as a result of the CR, this is great news. The agreement was announced by both House Appropriations Chair David Obey (D-WI) and Senate Appropriations Chair Robert Byrd (D-WV), so it’s a good bet that the bill will pass in its current form. The House will vote on the CR on Wednesday and the Senate will take it up soon after.
This is a big win for the science community. Protecting these increases for the federal investment in science in a resolution that cut more than 60 other domestic programs below FY 2006 levels sends a powerful signal that basic research is a national priority. Science was one of just a few priorities protected by Congressional Democrats in the bill — it joins federal highway programs, veteran’s health care, the FBI and local law enforcement, and Pell grant funding. The science community — along with its partners in industry — weighed in heavily in support of ACI funding, and its clear that advocacy had the desired effect. So thanks to all of you who joined with CRA as part of the Computing Research Advocacy Network to help make the case for science. It’s clear your voices were heard!
We’ll have more details as this bill moves towards final passage. Then it’s on to FY 2008, which just might be off to a good start.
Update: (5:50 pm, 1/31/07) — The House easily passed the measure today, unamended, by a vote of 286-140. The Senate should take up the resolution next week.
Update: (4:22 pm, 2/8/07) — * a closer look at the numbers actually in the resolution show that it only specifically calls out NSF’s R&RA account, increasing it $335 million over FY 2006 to $4.7 billion (matching the Administration’s request). It appears the remainder of NSF’s accounts aren’t addressed in the resolution and so they’ll stay at FY 06 levels.
The Senate is considering the resolution today. The Senate Democrats have apparently blocked any amendments to the resolution from Republicans (using some of the Senate’s arcane procedural techniques), so it’s likely it will pass in its current form.
ACI not in SOTU, but Administration “still fully committed”
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY07 Appropriations, FY08 Appropriations /by Peter HarshaIn contrast to last year’s State of the Union address by the President, this year’s speech didn’t feature much in the way of competitiveness or themes. While we’ve gotten many assurances from the White House in recent weeks that the President’s American Competitiveness Initiative — introduced with great fanfare last year and currently mired in the debacle which has become the FY 07 Appropriations process — is still a priority for the Administration and will continue in the FY 08 budget, in the wake of Tuesday’s State of the Union I thought I’d just check in again and make sure things hadn’t changed. Fortunately, they haven’t. Here’s the word from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (posted with permission):
The White House also indicated it plans to continue working to see ACI addressed in whatever final resolution Congress comes up with for FY 07 appropriations. News on that front is that the House plans to take up the CR next week, but as of this writing, there’s still no final decision on what will make the cut and what won’t. By pledging to “eliminate earmarks” in the CR, appropriators will free up somewhere on the order of $17 billion to $33 billion in funding to apply to agencies for FY 07. But that range demonstrates the difficulties the decision-makers are facing — gaining consensus on what constitutes an earmark in this case is fraught with political landmines. As a result, there is even talk at the moment of yet again extending the CR for a short duration past the Feb 15th deadline to give appropriators more time to negotiate a CR that will extend the balance of the fiscal year.
As always, as we learn more detail, we’ll pass it on….
House Science Subommittee Chairs Announced
/In: Misc., People, Policy /by MelissaNorrThe House Committee on Science and Technology has announced its membership and subcommittee chairs for the 110th Congress. The committee membership includes 24 Democrats and 20 Republicans with one vacancy on the minority membership. The subcommittee structure is slightly different with this Congress in that the some subcommittee names have been changed to more accurately reflect their jurisdictions and a Subcommittee on Investigation and Oversight has been added. The complete list of committee members as well as the subcommittees memberships is available here.
Subcommittee on Energy & Environment
Chairman Nick Lampson (D-TX)
Ranking Member Bob Inglis (R-SC)
Subcommittee on Technology & Innovation
Chairman David Wu (D-OR)
Ranking Member Phil Gingrey (R-GA)
Subcommittee on Research & Science Education
Chairman Brian Baird (D-WA)
Ranking Member Vern Ehlers (R-MI)
Subcommittee on Space & Aeronautics
Chairman Mark Udall (D-CO)
Ranking Member Ken Calvert (R-CA)
Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight
Chairman Brad Miller (D-NC)
Ranking Member F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-WI)
Speaker’s Speech Emphasizes Innovation
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY07 Appropriations, Policy /by MelissaNorrSpeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, along with Majority Leader Harry Reid, gave the State of Our Union speech last week at the National Press Club. Pelosi’s portion of the speech covered many topics including innovation. Highlights:
We hope this means that basic science research agencies like NSF will receive the President’s proposed increases for the FY07 budget in the forthcoming CR and further increases in future budgets.
The full text of the speech can be found here.
CR Impacts on NSF
/In: American Competitiveness Initiative, Funding, FY07 Appropriations /by MelissaNorrNSF has released some data on the impact of a “continuing resolution” on the agency for FY 2007, something we have discussed previously in this space. It confirms essentially what we expected: programs will have reduced funding for FY 2007 or be put on hold and award rates and award size will decline signficantly. Some examples:
Dr. Arden Bement, Director of NSF, posted a letter regarding the CR impacts online. The letter states:
Stay tuned and we will update you on the CR status and impacts to agencies as we learn more.