CRFP - reating Visions for Computing Research

Creating Visions for Computing Research

The Computing Community Consortium (CCC) invites proposals for visioning workshops that will catalyze and enable innovative research at the frontiers of computing. Successful activities will articulate new research visions, galvanize community interest in those visions, mobilize support for those visions from the computing research community, government leaders, and funding agencies, and encourage broader segments of society to participate in computing research and education.

Last revised: December 2019

History: Issued June 2007; Revised December 2007, June 2008, October 2008, April 2011, September 2011, January 2012, September 2013, September 2014, November 2015, January 2017, February 2018

Workshop Structure and Criteria

Workshops are required to have a tangible output – for example, a whitepaper (or set thereof) or workshop report. Workshop outcomes should be targeted to multiple audiences (the research community, science policy groups or funding agencies, the general public), and the deliverables should be tailored for easy dissemination. CCC will help to support both workshop organization and the subsequent generation and communication of the output.

The CCC can also support smaller gatherings, like roundtables, on timely topics as well as colocating workshops at existing conferences as long as the plan includes bringing new perspectives into the workshop and roundtable discussions.

The CCC encourages creative ideas from all segments of the computing research community on topics ranging from the formulation of new research areas and technologies to the use of new or existing research ideas and technologies to address important scientific or societal challenges.

Review Process and Criteria

Each proposal will be reviewed based on its potential to engage a segment of the research community, policy, and funding agencies around a compelling vision and need. The CCC Council will review the proposal and provide comments in a timely manner (typically within 4-8 weeks).

Proposals may be submitted by email anytime to as an attachment in PDF or Word. For CCC planning purposes, proposals with start dates prior to Fall 2020 should be submitted by April 15, 2020.

Questions about this RFP should also be sent to

CCC/CRA Staff Support

CCC/CRA staff supports workshops so that workshop organizers can use their talents most effectively and function more like a technical program chair than a general chair. Staff handle logistics like obtaining venue, inviting participants, arranging hotel rooms, implementing meeting logistics (rooms, A/V, and meals), and handling travel reimbursements. Organizers— in consultation with CCC—determine meeting topics and goals, prepare list of invitees, arrange workshop schedule including choosing any speakers, run the workshop, and prepare follow-up (talks and report) to enhance the workshop’s impact.

Future Solicitations

The CCC expects to re-issue this solicitation periodically.

Visioning Best Practices Guide

This guide shares further insight about the visioning process, from idea conception through program formation. It includes suggested activities, sample wording and a timeline. This document will be updated periodically. Also see, slides from a visioning activities webinar.

Examples of Successful CCC Visioning Proposals

Example 1
Example 2
Example 3

Preparing a Proposal

Proposed activities can take many forms. A small group of people might have an idea and want to engage a larger, more established community to create a vision for a new research agenda that broadens the scope of the topic and creates community interest in it. A group of researchers may wish to re-energize a community by organizing a series of workshops to create a roadmap for the field. An interdisciplinary group may need to bring multiple communities together to catalyze a new interdisciplinary research area. In all cases, the proposing group is expected to have the research expertise, visibility, and leadership 2 skills necessary to make the proposed effort a success.

The length of the project description should be commensurate with the scope of the proposed activities, but not longer than six (6) pages. *Note that we seek activities that create visions for broad research agendas, not proposals whose primary purpose is to secure future funding for the participants.

A well-formulated proposal should do the following:

describe the visioning topic area and its current state of development within the field,

explain the proposed activities in detail (if more than one activity, be sure to demonstrate the differences between the activities, the rationale for more than one activity, and the mechanisms to coordinate across activities),

connect the activity and the vision: how does the former support/foster the latter?

justify why this vision and this activity are appropriate now,

specify the intended outcomes of the workshop, and

describe how those outcomes can be used to advance the visioning topic area.

A complete proposal must also:

identify the organizing committee,

include biographical sketches of the organizers,

propose a representative set of potential workshop invitees (be sure to include representation from industry, policy,  and funding organizations),

provide a budget with justification, and

articulate how the success of the workshop and its outcomes can be assessed.

Funded activities are expected to last from six months to two years, depending on the scope of the activity. Requested support can range from funding a roundtable discussion to help ideas germinate to a series of workshops over a number of years. Budgets can range in size from $10,000 to as much as $200,000, depending on the size and scope of effort that will be supported. Keep in mind that larger efforts (multiple workshops, higher budgets, etc.) can become too broad, making it difficult to bring the final products together. The Organizers are expected to lead the effort on behalf of the community, so the CCC will not cover salary support for the Organizers. Exceptions to these guidelines need to be very well justified.